Compare any two players on projection, matchup, floor and ceiling, then get a verdict with a confidence level attached.
Physical book · Printed to order
Plan your lineup and record results for all 18 weeks, with a draft recap, scoring reference, playoff bracket and season awards.
Physical coil-bound book · 51 pages · US Letter (8.5 × 11 in)
View the book on EtsyFree PDF
Weekly decision framework: matchup tiers, floor/ceiling rules, and a streaming guide for kickers and DST.
Save or receive by email. Marketing is optional.
Start/sit is the single most repeated decision in fantasy football. You make roughly a dozen of them every week, they are worth exactly the point gap between the two players, and across a season they swing more matchups than your draft did. They are also where managers lose the most points to guesswork, because the decision usually gets made in the last few minutes before kickoff on whichever name feels hotter.
The one thing worth internalising: where the calculator puts two players within about a point of each other, they really are that close, and the correct move is to start the one whose role is more certain rather than agonising over the decimal.
Most start/sit decisions come down to four inputs. This calculator weighs them into a single comparable score so you stop second-guessing your lineup at 12:55pm Sunday.
Median expected points from a credible source (FantasyPros consensus, NumberFire, etc.). The single most predictive input, but never the only one.
How favourable is the opponent for this position? Use defensive rank vs position. 10 = top-3 worst defense, 1 = top-3 best.
Realistic worst-case outcome: the points the player scores if everything goes wrong but they still play. Important when you are favoured to win.
Realistic best-case outcome. Important when you are an underdog and need a boom week to flip the matchup.
The four inputs matter in different proportions depending on who you are deciding between. Weight them the same way at every position and you will bench good running backs and start bad kickers.
| Position | What decides it | Practical rule |
|---|---|---|
| QB | Matchup and rushing floor | Stream on opponent unless you hold one of the few elite passers. A rushing quarterback has a floor a pocket passer cannot match. |
| RB | Workload, then matchup | Volume beats opponent. A back with 18 touches against a good defence outscores a committee back against a bad one more often than not. |
| WR | Target share, then matchup | Targets are the input that carries. Shadow coverage from a genuine number one corner is the one matchup note worth acting on. |
| TE | Matchup, heavily | Outside the top few, tight end is a streaming position. Play the one facing a defence that gives up receptions to the middle of the field. |
| K | Game environment | Start kickers in games projected to be high scoring and indoors or in mild weather. Ignore the kicker himself almost entirely. |
| DST | Opponent, entirely | Stream against turnover-prone offences and backup quarterbacks. No defence is good enough to start blind every week. |
If the decision you are actually making is whether to trade one of the two rather than bench him, the trade analyzer answers that question instead, and the playoff calculator tells you whether you should be playing for a floor or a ceiling in the first place.
Say you are choosing between two flex options in a week you are favoured to win. The calculator blends projection (50%), matchup (weighted in), floor (15%) and ceiling (10%) into one comparable score for each player.
| Input | Player A (steady WR) | Player B (boom RB) |
|---|---|---|
| Projection | 12.5 pts | 12.0 pts |
| Matchup (1-10) | 6 | 8 |
| Floor | 9 pts | 4 pts |
| Ceiling | 17 pts | 24 pts |
The projections are nearly level, so the tie breaks on floor and ceiling. Because you are favoured this week, the higher floor wins and the calculator leans to Player A: you only need a safe, likely-positive score, not a boom. Flip the situation, project yourself to lose, and Player B's 24-point ceiling becomes the correct swing. That is the whole logic of a start or sit calculator: match the risk of the player to the risk of the matchup.
A start/sit calculator weighs each player's projected points, matchup quality, floor (worst-case outcome), and ceiling (best-case outcome) into a single comparison score. The player with the higher score is the start.
Yes. This start or sit calculator compares any two rostered players at any position, in any scoring format. Enter each player's projection, matchup rating, floor and ceiling, and it returns a single start-or-sit verdict with a confidence level. Use it for a flex decision, a QB streaming choice, or a coin-flip between two defenses.
Start the higher floor when you are favored to win the matchup or you need a safe baseline. Start the higher ceiling when you are projected to lose and need a boom outcome to swing the week.
For RBs and WRs, matchup is meaningful but rarely overrides talent. Start your studs against bad matchups. For QBs, TEs, kickers, and DSTs, matchup is the dominant factor and you should stream based on the weekly opponent.
Recency bias. Owners over-react to last week's blow-up game and bench reliable players for the hot hand. Stick with talent and projected role over single-week noise.
Start/sit is the weekly decision about which of your rostered players go into your active lineup and which stay on the bench. Only points from starters count, so a start/sit call is worth exactly the difference between the two players' scores that week. Over a 17-week season those differences decide more matchups than your draft does.
Compare the two players on four things rather than one: projected points, how favourable the opponent is for that position, the player's realistic floor and the player's realistic ceiling. Enter both into the calculator above and it weighs them into a single score. Where the two come out within about a point of each other, the honest answer is that it does not matter much, and you should pick the player whose role is more certain.
Almost never on matchup alone. Talent and workload are far more predictive week to week than opponent rank, so a top-12 running back facing the best run defence in the league still starts. The exceptions are genuine ones: a player limited in practice, a player in a committee whose snap share is shrinking, or a game with an extreme weather forecast that suppresses passing volume.
Directionally useful and individually unreliable. Consensus projections do a decent job of ranking players over a full season and a poor job of predicting any single week, because touchdowns are close to random at small sample sizes. That is why this calculator weighs projection at 50 percent rather than 100, and why a one-point gap in the output is not a reason to change your lineup.
Yes, and mostly at the margins of your lineup. In full PPR a possession receiver or pass-catching back with 6 catches for 45 yards is a usable floor play. In standard the same line is worth 4.5 points and close to unstartable. Set the projections you feed the calculator in your own league's format, because comparing a PPR projection to a standard one produces a wrong answer that looks right.